Bonds have performed so strongly that some investors now question “why they should take the risk of investing in stocks if lower risk bonds have higher rewards,” Janet Brown writes in her latest post for the Forbes Intelligent Investing blog.

Janet looks back at the long-term returns of stocks versus bonds from 1925 through 2011 to show that “when you take a longer view, you can see that stocks have added tremendous value.” Stocks have outperformed bonds for every 25-year period from 1925 through 2011. The last 25-year period, from year-end 1986 to year-end 2011, had the lowest excess stock returns – but stocks still managed to beat bonds by about 2% a year on average.

“This isn’t to say that you shouldn’t also invest in bonds” Janet writes. “Bonds can be a good buffer against the volatility of stocks and they can be a good option for investors with a shorter time horizon.”

Click here to read the full post.

(To read all of Janet’s posts on the Forbes Intelligent Investing blog, click here).

{ 0 comments }

Do Fund Expenses Matter?

by noloadfundx on May 15, 2012

Fund expenses get a lot of attention and for good reason:  a fund’s expenses are a drag on its performance. But does knowing funds’ expenses help you select which funds are most likely to perform well in the coming months or years? No. Expenses matter, but other factors matter even more.

If funds all had the same performance returns, choosing low expense funds would make perfect sense because the lower the expenses, the more of the return you’d get to keep. But returns often aren’t even in the same ballpark. For example, in the May 2012 issue of NoLoad FundX the best performing core fund  for the 12-months ending April 30, 2012 was T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth (TRBCX), which gained 11.8%, and the worst performer was iShares MSCI EMU (EZU), which lost -26.4%—a difference in return of 38.2%.

The range of fund expenses is much smaller. Expenses in Class 3 range from a low of 0.07% to a high of 2.0%—a difference of 1.93%. Interestingly, TRBCX and EZU, have very similar expenses: 0.77% and 0.52%, respectively. If you’d chosen EZU simply because it had slightly lower expenses, however, you’d have experienced much lower returns over this time period.

Below we plotted the 159 funds in Class 3 based on their 12-month returns through April 30, 2012, and their expense ratios. You can see that there is little correlation between low expenses and higher performance.

This chart (above) looks back only at the last year, but we’ve found the same holds true over much longer time periods. The second chart, below, looks at a larger group of diversified funds – 303 funds in all – and over a much longer time period of nearly 22 years (December 31, 1989 through September 30, 2011).

In this larger group of diversified funds, you can see most of the fund’s expense ratios fall between 0.5% and 2%, while the annualized returns over this nearly 22 year time period of time range from around 3% to nearly 15%.  (The top 20 top performers are circled in yellow and show a range of expenses from low to high.)

For more on our nearly 22 year study of 306 diversified mutual funds, click here.

 

{ 0 comments }

Subscriber Q&A: Commission-Free ETFs in NoLoad FundX

May 10, 2012

Subscriber Question: In the Class 3 Buys, you note whether a fund is available as an NTF (no transaction fee) fund or fee fund, but you don’t show whether an ETF is available without a commission. Why not? NoLoad FundX Answer: Different brokers offer different assortments of commission-free exchange traded funds (ETFs), some of which [...]

Click here for More

ETFdb’s List of ETFs that Issue K-1s

May 8, 2012

One of our goals on the NoLoad FundX blog is to share useful information or articles that we come across and one webpage that we’ve bookmarked recently is on a site called ETFdb, which describes itself as “The Comprehensive & Original ETF Database.”  On it they include a “comprehensive list of ETFs that issue a [...]

Click here for More

Stocks Pulled Back & Bonds Rallied

May 3, 2012

Stocks edged lower in April on the heels of two very strong quarters. The broad S&P 500 Index declined -0.6% in April, the large-cap DJIA gained 0.2%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 lost -1.6%. The DJ World Index of large foreign stocks, excluding the U.S., lost -1.8%. The market has come a long way in [...]

Click here for More

May 2012 Fund & ETF Changes

May 1, 2012

Each month, we highlight the changes we’ve made to the NoLoad FundX fund and ETF listings. Newly Added Class 2  iSharesRussell MidCap Growth (IWP) Moved PowerShares Pure Mid Growth (PXMG) from the newsletter Class 2 to the online Supplement Class 2. Added to Online Supplement Vanguard Mid Cap Growth (VOT) Broker Availability The following T. [...]

Click here for More

On Forbes: Capturing Global Trends

May 1, 2012

Historically, there have been several periods when it definitely paid to “go global,” and other periods when U.S. stocks were hard to beat. In her latest post on the Forbes Intelligent Investing blog, “Capture Global Trends to Improve Returns,” Janet Brown explains how investors can take advantage of global trends. The first step, she writes, [...]

Click here for More

Understanding Relative Strength

April 26, 2012

Relative strength is essentially a ratio that compares the daily percent return of one index or security versus that of another index or security.  Relative strength doesn’t indicate whether an investment is gaining or losing.  Instead, it shows how one investment is performing relative to another investment. Relative strength is a useful way to track [...]

Click here for More

Has the Market Peaked?

April 24, 2012

Stocks had a strong first quarter, but April’s market correction prompted some investors to worry that the market has peaked. Mark Hulbert and J.P. Morgan’s David Kelly compared current market conditions with past market tops and both found signs that this bull market may not be over yet. In Advisor Perspectives, J.P. Morgan’s David Kelly [...]

Click here for More

Stock and Bond Rotations

April 19, 2012

Conventional wisdom is that stocks benefit from low interest rates and will be hurt when rates rise because rising rates will tighten monetary conditions. But recently on stockcharts.com, John Murphy offered a compelling argument that stocks and bonds compete for investor capital and that low rates can hurt stocks by encouraging investors to stick with [...]

Click here for More